On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Coverity complains about a use after free for 'res1' and 'res2' since > we use the value of the pointers in a 'dev_dbg()' after they have been > freed. That's not really a problem, but it still seems cleaner to > defer freeing until we are completely done with the pointers.
Makes sense. I am taking this one. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs _______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
