On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > On 28/04/2015 at 13:30:58 +0100, Lee Jones wrote : > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > > > From: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]> > > > > > > The at91rm9200 SoC embeds a Memory Controller block which is used to > > > configure several aspects of the platform: > > > - AHB/APB Bus behavior > > > - SDRAM Controller > > > - EBI (External Bus Interface) and SMC (Static Memory Controller) config > > > > > > Those registers might be accessed by different drivers, hence we need to > > > define it as a syscon device. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]> > > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> > > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-mc.h | 144 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 144 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-mc.h > > > > I've lost context here. > > > > Is it okay to take this now? > > > > I'd say that it would be better to get that one through the AT91 tree > along with the following patches as they depend on it. Is that okay with > you?
Yes, no problem. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
