Em Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:33:27AM -0700, David S. Ahern escreveu: > On 12/14/10 07:06, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:52:45AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > >> Ok, there are still some problems:
> >> It is escaping the symfs jail for /home/acme/bin/perf, > >> /lib64/libpthread-2.5.so > >> and kernel modules, investigating... > > Those 'G' signals means DSO__ORIG_GUEST_KMODULE, since you were not > > prefixing that case with symfs, it was the jail leak point, fixed, doing > > some more testing before merging. > yuk. I did not touch the hypervisor paths. > So the 'guest' route is tried all the time because of the origin list -- > even when it's not applicable. Right, I don't like the way kvm is supported, will revisit this at some point. If build-ids were first class citizens, all this would be moot :-\ - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
