On 01/14/11 10:00, Thomas Renninger wrote: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf- > [email protected]/msg00057.html > Looks slightly different, the segfault should happen in: > process_sample_event > But looks very much related, possibly it has not been made/make with > DEBUG=1 > and -O6 was added and the backtrace is not 100% correct?
perf was built with DEBUG=1; that's how I got the pretty backtrace versus having the arguments optimized out. The cpu=6291457 is the garbage causing the segfault (there are only 2 cores in the system). 6291457 = 0x600001. Perhaps a mask is missing? David > > I still did not have time to send it out, will do so on Mo. > > Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
