On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:27:20AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 07/11/2011 03:38 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> > Builds for 32-bit binaries on a 64-bit host currently fail with the error:
> > 
> > gcc -o /tmp/perf-ppc/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.o -c 
> > -fno-omit-frame-pointer -ggdb3 -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 -Werror -O6 
> > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Wshadow 
> > -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default 
> > -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wwrite-strings 
> > -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes 
> > -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes 
> > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -m32 -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector 
> > -Wvolatile-register-var -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 
> > -Iutil/include -Iarch/x86/include -I/tmp/perf-ppc/ -DLIBELF_NO_MMAP 
> > -DDWARF_SUPPORT -DNO_NEWT_SUPPORT -DNO_LIBPERL -DNO_LIBPYTHON 
> > -DHAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE -DNO_STRLCPY -DARCH_X86_64 
> > bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.S
> > bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S: Assembler messages:
> > bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:29: Error: bad register name `%rdi'
> > bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:34: Error: invalid instruction 
> > suffix for `movs'
> > bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:50: Error: bad register name `%rdi'
> > bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:61: Error: bad register name `%rdi'
> > ...
> > 
> > The problem is the detection of the host arch without considering passed in
> > flags. This change fixes 32-bit builds via:
> > 
> > make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-m32 
> > 
> > and 64-bit builds still reference the memcpy_64.S.
> > 
> 
> Fairly trivial change to the Makefile. Any objections? I believe Arnaldo
> is out for a few more days and realistically another week to get through
> a month's backlog.
> 
> David

Yeah, looks good.

Thanks.

Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to