On 9/22/12 1:58 AM, Mikolaj Konarski wrote:
Are we missing anything? Is the "--timestamp" option of perf-record
related in any way? Any other tips?

That option adds the timestamps to the samples if it were not otherwise added.


We're working around right now by syncing with a timestamp
of a known event, but that leaves us vulnerable to a time drift.
If there's no way currently to generate externally meaningful
timestamps, could we file a feature request for the sake of the future?

You mean like this: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/7/638

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to