On 9/22/12 1:58 AM, Mikolaj Konarski wrote:
Are we missing anything? Is the "--timestamp" option of perf-record related in any way? Any other tips?
That option adds the timestamps to the samples if it were not otherwise added.
We're working around right now by syncing with a timestamp of a known event, but that leaves us vulnerable to a time drift. If there's no way currently to generate externally meaningful timestamps, could we file a feature request for the sake of the future?
You mean like this: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/7/638 David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html