Hi, Apologies if the answer to this is someplace I have not looked. I've searched this list and other sites/FAQ's.
I've noticed that command listed in the subject line always yields <not counted> cycles unless the target process is suspended. I have noticed this with a few different distributions. Is the fact that the target process has to be suspended at least once a known design limitation or would it be considered a bug? Thank you for your help. Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
