Hi AmirReza, On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:14:21 -0500, AmirReza Ghods wrote: > Thank you for your response, but that doesn't really answer my > question. I wanted to know why scaling of the event counts is > implemented in "perf stat" but NOT implemented in "perf record".
I think the reason is "perf record" lacks enabled/running time information in the samples. > > As for caring about the exact sample count of perf report, I don't think > the relative usefulness of the values is a good reason to leave users > with some verifiably false results, and expect them to figure out why > they got them. I know some users, including myself, will be confused to > measure event counts differing (sometimes 300% in my experience) from > what they might expect. You might want to use "perf stat --no-scale" then. ;-) Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
