Yeah, I applied the patch you posted, and it works. Thanks!
-BenRI On 08/18/2015 03:05 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:25:29PM -0400, Ben Redelings wrote: SNIP(/home/bredelings/Devel/bali-phy/local/clang-3.7/bin/bali-phy) 306ce1 empirical_frequencies (/home/bredelings/Devel/bali-phy/local/clang-3.7/bin/bali-phy) 3330d9 get_smodel (/home/bredelings/Devel/bali-phy/local/clang-3.7/bin/bali-phy) 4dc133 get_smodels (/home/bredelings/Devel/bali-phy/local/clang-3.7/bin/bali-phy) 4e02ea create_A_and_T_model (/home/bredelings/Devel/bali-phy/local/clang-3.7/bin/bali-phy) This is more what I was expecting, and similar to what I used to get with --call-graph=dwarf. However, the call chains that I get using DWARF tend to be longer and lead to more accurate results, so I would prefer to use DWARF instead of lbr. Is there something that I'm doing wrong? Also, it seems like --call-graph=dwarf successfully records call chains that can be seen via perf report, but somehow 'perf script' doesn't show them. Could that happen? -BenRI P.S. I'm using debian's kernel 4.1.0 and perf tools on a Core i3-4030.hum, it's probably fixed already: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=143945026316969&w=2 it's currently in Arnaldo's perf/core branch jirka
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
