El mié, 06-05-2009 a las 15:23 -0500, Gustavo Picon escribió: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On May 6, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Felix Manuel Arismendi Quispichuco wrote: > > en todo caso dale una leída al punto 1.1 del pdf obtenido del > > siguiente > > enlace: > > > > http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publications/documents/06.reports/06tn012.html > > > > http://www.sei.cmu.edu/pub/documents/06.reports/pdf/06tn012.pdf > > Felix, no se si habrás leido el PDF que citas, pero en el mismo punto > 1.1 (en el 1.1.1 para ser exacto), se menciona sobre tu concepto de > escalabilidad, esto:
Fijate, he leido esto, parece que tu no, que curiosa es la vida :-D, me tocó reir a mi. "5 Summary and Conclusions The ability or inability of systems (or systems of systems) to deal with issues of scale is becoming increasingly important in DoD and other systems. In studying this problem, we discovered that there was no uniform definition of what constituted a scalable system—an omission that we’ve attempted to rectify in this report. We’ve shown that there are actually two common uses of the word scalability: 1. Scalability is the ability to handle increased workload (without adding resources to a system). 2. Scalability is the ability to handle increased workload by repeatedly applying a cost effective strategy for extending a system’s capability. We’ve also shown how those definitions relate to real-world systems, both informally and formally. We were helped in this effort by the results of both a literature survey and interviews with three individuals who have first-hand knowledge of scalability issues of differing magnitude. The synthesis of our investigation is the concept of the scalability audit presented in Section 4. A scalability audit can be applied to evaluate whether the architectural design of a system(1) can be easily augmented to handle a significantly higher workload over its anticipated lifetime or (2) is robust enough to accommodate an unexpected, significant increase in work load where failure to handle the increased workload would be disastrous or very severe for the system. We have not yet used the scalability audit to conduct a review of a real system development effort, and that would be the next logical step for our study of scalability." Saludos. FMAQ. > > """Our first definition (de escalabilidad) reflects a limited, rather > informal, use of the term scalability, in which the concern is only > that a system continues to perform adequately as its workload grows. > Typi-cally when the term is used in this way, no particular attention > is given to how a system will have to be modified when the load grows > too big. In our review of research on scalability, we found that the > first definition seemed to be what people had in mind when they were > using the term informally, ...""" > > Nota el *limited* y el *informal*. > > > Está claro que tu concepto de escalabilidad esta errado. > > Je :) > > Saludos. > > - - tabo > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Lista de correo Linux-plug Temática: Discusión general sobre Linux Peruvian Linux User Group (http://www.linux.org.pe) Participa suscribiéndote y escribiendo a: [email protected] Para darte de alta, de baja o hacer ajustes a tu suscripción visita: http://listas.linux.org.pe/mailman/listinfo/linux-plug IMPORTANTE: Reglas y recomendaciones http://www.linux.org.pe/listas/reglas.php http://www.linux.org.pe/listas/comportamiento.php http://www.linux.org.pe/listas/recomendaciones.php
