On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 14:39:34 -0600 "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Power is actually reported in wall draw. This includes drives, power > supply inefficiencies, etc. In the case of a blade system, the power > is measured at the blade but is converted to wall draw. It includes > all devices on the blade, but does not include any chassis > infrastructure such as fans, IO modules, Chassis management > controller, etc. The Chassis management controller also reports > power consumption. This also is reported in the context of wall > draw. Since it monitors the entire chassis, this number includes > fans, blades, CMCs, IO modules, power supply inefficiencies, etc. I > will respond to some of the other issues raised by John Lloyd > separately when I have time to verify a few items. > > Wayne Weilnau > Systems Management Technologist > Dell | OpenManage Software Development Hm. Well, I've seen several cases where they don't match, and none where they do. (None involving blade systems). Is it possible that some systems have better sensor placement than others? Unfortunately, I don't have any specific information because this was at a previous place of employ. Cheers, a _______________________________________________ Linux-PowerEdge mailing list [email protected] https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge Please read the FAQ at http://lists.us.dell.com/faq
