On 14/12/16 12:52, Stefan M. Radman wrote:
> Hi Lejeczek,
>
> The Red Hat Access website has two solution documents (content restricted to 
> subscribers).
> One for rgmanager (RHEL5-6)
> How to configure fence_ipmilan with Red Hat Enterprise Linux High 
> Availability Add On
> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/54843
> and one for pacemaker (RHEL 6-7)
> How to configure fence_ipmilan with Red Hat Enterprise Linux High 
> Availability Pacemaker Add On on RHEL 6, 7
> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2271811
>
> One of my favorite open resources is Clusterlabs
> http://wiki.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Configure_Multiple_Fencing_Devices_Using_pcs
>
> The pacemaker solution has been working reliably here (RHEL6,HA AddOn,PE720) 
> for more than two years now and actually triggered a few times, at least once 
> during an actual hardware issue.
>
> Here is the stonith configuration we're using in a 2-node HA cluster running 
> pacemaker on RHEL6:
>
> # pcs stonith create node1-pwr fence_ipmilan ipaddr=192.168.1.1 lanplus=true 
> login=root passwd=calvin pcmk_host_list=node1
> # pcs resource ban node1-pwr node1
> # pcs stonith create node2-pwr fence_ipmilan ipaddr=192.168.1.2 lanplus=true 
> login=root passwd=calvin pcmk_host_list=node2
> # pcs resource ban node2-pwr node2
> # pcs stonith show
>   node2-pwr (stonith:fence_ipmilan): Started node1
>   node1-pwr (stonith:fence_ipmilan): Started node2
>
> Make sure you have IPMI and redundancy (NIC failover) properly set up on your 
> iDRAC.
>
> Stefan
oh, this is nice, many! thanks Stefan
my iDrac6 currently runs off a dedicated NIC, and afaik it 
can be either that or "shared".
Thus, with "dedicated" not failover, am I right?
And one would not sacrifice "dedicated" for redundancy, 
would one?
regards


>
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 11:55 AM, lejeczek 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> hi everybody
>
> just a quick question, probably very easy for you guys -
> iDracs as fencing device in HA configs(rhel's)? Would there
> be any docs/howtos?
> Or maybe there is better way to do that with PE servers?
>
> many thanks,
> L.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-PowerEdge mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.us.dell.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-poweredge

Reply via email to