On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 01:27:54PM -0800, Bill Unruh wrote: > Then demand that they authenticate themselves to you via eap. If that is > what you want then demand it. Why are you trying to force them into > demanding it from you? " I want you to do something. But I do not want to > ask you to do it, I want to force you to ask me to do it". That is not how > the world works. If you want something, ask for it.
I don't want to *force* the peer to authenticate me. I want to *hint* him. If he doesn't want that, I close because that doesn't satisfy me. This seems not so strange to me. > > > >This is the behaviour I were looking for: > > Sorry, the behaviour you want is that the two sides never agree on anything > and refuse to talk to each other? Is more desiderable that they don't connect than a client connecting to an untrusted server without authentication > Well demand that it authenticate itself to you via eap. In tls there's a client and a server. Roles cannot be swapped > > That is the other sides perfect right. If someone walked up to you and > demanded that you demand to see his driver's license, don;t you think a > valid reaction on your part is to walk away? Yes. This isn't a problem. The problem is when I trust him, but we haven't shown driver licenses each other. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
