Am 02.12.2015 um 00:16 schrieb Eric Anholt: > Stefan Wahren <[email protected]> writes: > >> It's possible that the pwm clock become an orphan. So better >> check the result of clk_get_rate in order to prevent a division >> by zero. > How would we lose our clock when we're keeping the clock enabled from > driver probe until remove?
It's not the problem that we lose the clock inside this driver. The pwm clock could be initial assigned to a unregistered parent clock like "GND". I'm refering to this discussion: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-rpi-kernel/2015-November/002603.html > > Patches 1 and 3 are: > > Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pwm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
