Joel,

On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 07:01:15PM +0100, Corin Hartland-Swann wrote:
> > Yes - but I was curious as to whether this kernel memory bug had been
> > fixed yet, or whether it was still happening. I'd like to upgrade from
> > 2.2.14 (because of the security hole) but the do_try_to_free_pages() bug
> > is IMHO a much greater problem than the hole.
> 
>       Well, we'll see how it goes.  I guess I'm gonna have to live
> with the memory issue, because I have needs for the .18 features.

If you can put a serial connection between this box and another, you can
sometimes recover from the bug if you have console access...

Do tell me how it goes once it's in production...

> > Do you have physical access to the machine? Maybe you could re-seat the
> > cabling and/or swap out the controller.
> 
>       The drive failed again.  Just on some reads (an ftp connection).
> It's really shaping up to be the drive.  I opened the box and checked
> the cables.  They looked fine.  So I yanked the drive and I'm running on
> half a mirror now.  I intend to pound the drive in another box.

Sounds like a plan.

> > What do the boot= and root= lines in your lilo.conf look like? They should
> > point to the root MD device, and not to one of the individual disks, eg:
> 
>       I'm not booting off of the md device.  When it gets to the MD
> device, it won't start it (autostarting).  /etc/raidtab had both disks
> in the config.
>       In addition, when I booted after I removed the allegedly faulty
> disk, the md device would not start up because it couldn't find the
> second device.  I'd think that it would start up in the degraded state,
> not fail to start at all.  I guess I'm mistaken.

This should all be fixed if you booted off the MD device (even with only
one disk plugged in, as you have now).

> > Under RAID-1 the raw partition contains a valid ext2 partition, /which is
> > slightly smaller than the raw parition/. The remainder (at the end) stores
> > the RAID superblock.
> 
>       Ok, so I *should* be able to mount/fsck it.  I'm glad to be sure
> of that.

It relieved the hell out of me when I went for RAID-1. A definate bonus
over RAID-5.

Regards,

Corin

/------------------------+-------------------------------------\
| Corin Hartland-Swann   | Direct: +44 (0) 20 7544 4676        |
| Commerce Internet Ltd  | Mobile: +44 (0) 79 5854 0027        |
| 22 Cavendish Buildings |    Tel: +44 (0) 20 7491 2000        |
| Gilbert Street         |    Fax: +44 (0) 20 7491 2010        |
| Mayfair                |    Web: http://www.commerce.uk.net/ |
| London W1K 5HJ         | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]        |
\------------------------+-------------------------------------/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to