There is more interest, just not vocal. May want to look at LVM2 and its ability to use tagging to control enablement of VGs. This way it is not HW dependent.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Osicki Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 2:26 AM To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question: array locking, possible? It looks like we are the only two md users interested in such a feature. Not enough to get Neil's attention ;-) Regards, Chris On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 21:45:33 +0100 Jure Peèar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:55:49 +0100 > Chris Osicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I was thinking about it, I have no idea how to do it on Linux if ever > > possible. > > I connect over fibre channel SAN, using QLogic QLA2312 HBAS, if it matters. > > > > Anyone any hints? > > I too am running a jbod with md raid between two machines. So far md never > caused any kind of problems, altough I did have situations where both > machines were syncing mirrors at once. > > If there's a little tool to reserve a disk via scsi, I'd like to know about > it too. Even a piece of code would be enough. > > > -- > > Jure Peèar > http://jure.pecar.org/ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
