When an array is started we start one or two threads (two if
there is a reshape or recovery that needs to be completed).

We currently start these *before* the array is completely set up and
in particular before queue->queuedata is set.  If the thread
actually starts very quickly on another CPU, we can end up
dereferencing queue->queuedata and oops.

This patch also makes sure we don't try to start a recovery if
a reshape is being restarted.

### Diffstat output
 ./drivers/md/md.c    |   10 +++++-----
 ./drivers/md/raid5.c |    3 ---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff .prev/drivers/md/md.c ./drivers/md/md.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/md.c       2006-06-27 12:17:32.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/md.c   2006-06-27 12:17:32.000000000 +1000
@@ -3100,8 +3100,7 @@ static int do_md_run(mddev_t * mddev)
                }
        
        set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_NEEDED, &mddev->recovery);
-       md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
        
+
        if (mddev->sb_dirty)
                md_update_sb(mddev);
 
@@ -3121,7 +3120,7 @@ static int do_md_run(mddev_t * mddev)
         * start recovery here.  If we leave it to md_check_recovery,
         * it will remove the drives and not do the right thing
         */
-       if (mddev->degraded) {
+       if (mddev->degraded && !mddev->sync_thread) {
                struct list_head *rtmp;
                int spares = 0;
                ITERATE_RDEV(mddev,rdev,rtmp)
@@ -3142,10 +3141,11 @@ static int do_md_run(mddev_t * mddev)
                                       mdname(mddev));
                                /* leave the spares where they are, it 
shouldn't hurt */
                                mddev->recovery = 0;
-                       } else
-                               md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread);
+                       }
                }
        }
+       md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
+       md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread); /* possibly kick off a reshape */
 
        mddev->changed = 1;
        md_new_event(mddev);

diff .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c ./drivers/md/raid5.c
--- .prev/drivers/md/raid5.c    2006-06-27 12:16:41.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/raid5.c        2006-06-27 12:17:32.000000000 +1000
@@ -3248,9 +3248,6 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
                set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
                mddev->sync_thread = md_register_thread(md_do_sync, mddev,
                                                        "%s_reshape");
-               /* FIXME if md_register_thread fails?? */
-               md_wakeup_thread(mddev->sync_thread);
-
        }
 
        /* read-ahead size must cover two whole stripes, which is
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to