Neil Brown wrote:
Is 'bitmap' the best name for the sysfs file?
It seems a bit generic to me.
write-bits-here-to-dirty-them-in-the-bitmap
is probably (no, definitely) too verbose.
dirty-in-bitmap
maybe?
bitmap-set-bits
Any better suggestions?
I like "bitmap-set-bits" or "bitmap-dirty" maybe. I had thought about
this, but never changed the name. I agree, something more than just
"bitmap" is probably appropriate, so that if we ever add a generic
bitmap output or input (to clear bits, maybe) then we still have
"bitmap" available, and also because (as you said) "bitmap" is a little
too generic for what this interface really does.
Thanks,
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
