raid0.c doesn't need the #include <linux/vmalloc.h> either (and won't
compile for 2.0.35 with it). After that (and with the blkdev.h changes),
it compiles for 2.0.35.
It looks like the head of md_k.h has an error, though. Presumably, the
default should return -4, not -3:
static inline int pers_to_level (int pers)
{
switch (pers) {
case LVM: return -3;
case TRANSLUCENT: return -2;
case LINEAR: return -1;
case RAID0: return 0;
case RAID1: return 1;
case RAID5: return 5;
}
return -3;
}
Or is it intentionally defaulting to LVM?
Jorj
- Re: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 patch 1998.1... Bart Schuller
- Success report: RAID-0,1,4,5 patch 1998.12.14, 2.0.36/2... David Harris
- [patch 1998.12.15] (was: Re: Success report: RAID-... MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: Success report: RAID-0,1,4,5 patch 1998.12.14,... Dan Hollis
- Re: Success report: RAID-0,1,4,5 patch 1998.12... MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: Success report: RAID-0,1,4,5 patch 199... Osma Ahvenlampi
- RE: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version 0.90, 1998.11... John Lellis
- Re: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version 0.90, 19... Eric B. Sobalvarro
- RE: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version 0.90, 19... MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version 0.90... Jorj Bauer
- Re: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version ... MOLNAR Ingo
- Re: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version ... MOLNAR Ingo
- RE: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version 0.90, 19... Rob Vanderhoff
- RE: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version 0.90... Gary Allpike
- RE: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version 0.90... MOLNAR Ingo
- RE: RELEASE: RAID-0,1,4,5 and LVM version 0.90, 1998.11... John Lellis
