"Neulinger, Nathan R." wrote:
> Thanks, that is useful information, but ya know, that's pretty damned
> unnaceptable for recovering from a failure. What's the point of having
> redundancy if your server goes away when you lose a drive?
While I agree to a certain extent, if having to reboot the machine is
the _ONLY_ side effect of losing a drive in a RAID1 configuration, life
ain't all that bad. I do, however, realize that the users of the
machine may not understand this, though.
Mike.
--
======================================================================
Mike Frisch
Software Engineer
Hummingbird Communications Ltd. North York, Ontario, Canada
Disclaimer: I speak for myself, not my employer
