I have tried various values for chunksize, but the difference seems to be <10%. Raid5 is always significantly slower than raid0, maybe 35MB/s compared to 60MB/s. I use mke2fs -b4096 -i32768 -Rstride=xxx, with xxx being chunksize / 4k. This is still a mystery to me. I also notice that sequential reading of /dev/md0 is significantly slower than reading a file on a mounted FS on /dev/md0. I suppose there is more aggressive readahead happening in the mounted FS for some reason. Jan Edler
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Tim Walberg
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Jan Edler
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Tim Walberg
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Tim Moore
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Jan Edler
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Osma Ahvenlampi
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Tim Moore
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Jan Edler
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Lance Robinson
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Ingo Molnar
- RE: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Jan Edler
- RE: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Tom Livingston
- RE: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Ingo Molnar
- RE: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Tim Walberg
- RE: raid0 vs. raid5 read performa... Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read perf... Tim Walberg
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read perf... Tim Walberg
- RE: raid0 vs. raid5 read perf... Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Tim Walberg
- Re: raid0 vs. raid5 read performance Helge Hafting
