On Aug 18,  4:52pm, Marc Mutz wrote:
} Subject: Re: Some questions.

Good day to everyone interested in Linux raid.  I hope that this note
is helpful to your day.

> You can try to patch 2.2.11 with the 2.2.10 patch. It should apply more
> or less cleanly. The rest can be corrected by hand. Or use 2.2.12-final
> from Alan Cox's directory on ftp.*.kernel.org. It has the new raid stuff
> integrated. Probably Linus will say 'no' to that for the 'real' 2.2.12,
> but then this should be the only difference.

> > I think it's a shame that the kernel guys don't
> > let you integrate this code directly into the kernel, that would make 
> > it a lot easier for the users.

> It makes it "difficult" for all the all the others that are using
> old-style raid semantics and have chosen a rather poor distribution
> (SuSE, in my case) that still comes with the old raidtools :-(

We are using the new raid code heavily to do root, var and swap
mirroring on our production Linux servers.  Since I wanted to get out
of 2.2.10 I back-ported the 2.2.12 patches into 2.2.11 so that we
would have a clean diff against the stock 2.2.11 sources.

The patch can be picked up at:

        ftp://ftp.nodak.edu/pub/linux/ESD/kernel/raid0145-19990724-2.2.11.gz

We currently have production machines running RAID1 mirrors based on
this patch set so I think that it is correct.  Standard caveats about
being careful with this kind of stuff do apply though.

Hopefully others will find this useful.  Have a pleasant day.

> Marc

Greg

}-- End of excerpt from Marc Mutz

As always,
Dr. G.W. Wettstein           Enjellic Systems Development - Specializing
4206 N. 19th Ave.            in information infra-structure solutions.
Fargo, ND  58102             WWW: http://www.enjellic.com
Phone: 701-281-1686          EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I had far rather walk, as I do, in daily terror of eternity, than feel
that this was only a children's game in which all of the contestants
would get equally worthless prizes in the end."
                                -- T. S. Elliot

Reply via email to