On Aug 18, 4:10pm, Alan Meadows wrote:
} Subject: RAID1 over RAID0 on 2.2.10
> Hello,
>
> >From past messages I've gotten the feeling that some people consider
> 2.2.10 unstable just as 2.2.9, with the corrupt filesystem issue. Does
> anyone here have experience with 2.2.10 enough to know its stable, or
> is anyone firm on the idea that its unstable? None of the previous
> e-mails seem to be conclusive enough for me =)
We have production boxes running 2.2.10 with H.J.'s knfs patches and
the 0724 release of the RAID code for mirroring. We haven't had a
speck of trouble with it. We also have virgin 2.2.10's in production
with no problems.
Once I started to hear rumbles about problems I held off further
deployments of 2.2.10 until we had something a bit more stable.
Hopefully 2.2.12 will be what everyone is looking for.
Incidently the 2.2.10 machines running the RAID mirroring code have
their mirrors built on top of two drives which are driven by separate
AIC7890 channels (440BX motherboards). There was some talk that the
aic7xxx drivers might be implicated in the problem but we have not
experienced any difficulties.
> Thanks,
>
> Alan Meadows
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg
}-- End of excerpt from Alan Meadows
As always,
Dr. G.W. Wettstein Enjellic Systems Development - Specializing
4206 N. 19th Ave. in information infra-structure solutions.
Fargo, ND 58102 WWW: http://www.enjellic.com
Phone: 701-281-1686 EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"One of the reporters asked if the could "see" the INTERNET worm.
They tried to explain that it wasn't something that you could actually
see but is was merely a program that was running in the background.
One of the reporters asked, 'What if you had a color monitor?'"
-- UNKNOWN
