[ Saturday, September 18, 1999 ] James Manning wrote:
> Ok, I wrote a patch that passes the ctl_table pointer of
> /proc/dev/md as the param for raid?_init, but noticed differing
> opinions on return values (although it doesn't much matter)

[snip]

Well, I tried booting and it died with some SYSCTL() errors (figures :)
so if it looks like the patch at least has the right idea, let me know
and I'll try fixing up the problems... otherwise lemme know how you'd
like to see a settable raid1 balance implemented :)

James
-- 
Miscellaneous Engineer --- IBM Netfinity Performance Development

Reply via email to