Well, it does work, just wanted to make sure I had things ordered
properly.
Now, I ran raidsetfaulty on /dev/md2 with device /dev/md0. How do I get
it to use md0 again without destroying data? This is what I see now:
md2 : active raid1 md1[1] md0[2] 26876288 blocks [2/1] [_U] recovery=63% finish=32.3min
md0 : active raid0 sdc1[2] sdb1[1] sda1[0] 26876352 blocks 16k chunks
md1 : active raid0 sdf1[2] sde1[1] sdd1[0] 26876352 blocks 16k chunks
Thanks!
-jeremy
> On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 07:39:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I just need some help to make sure I'm doing this properly. All I ask is
> > for quick help on getting this proper.
> >
> > I have 6 9 gig disks. I want to create a 0/1 level configuration. This
> > is what I have in my raidtab:
> ...
>
> >From where I sit it looks just fine.
>
> You might want to use the same chunk size on all RAIDs though, I'm not
> sure what impact it might have on performance though (anyone?)
>
> > # Sample raid-1 configuration
> > raiddev /dev/md2
> > raid-level 1
>
> Oups! You forgot persistent-superblock here !
>
> > nr-raid-disks 2
> > nr-spare-disks 0
> > chunk-size 4
> > device /dev/md0
> > raid-disk 0
> > device /dev/md1
> > raid-disk 1
>
> Go ahead, tell us if it works, let's see a benchmark (otherwise we won't
> believe you ;)
>
> ................................................................
> : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : And I see the elder races, :
> :.........................: putrid forms of man :
> : Jakob �stergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, :
> : OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. :
> :.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
>
http://www.xxedgexx.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------
Y2K. We're all gonna die.
