Well, That's interesting, if I apply the patches in the opposite order,
they work.  Perhaps we need a road map as to what order patches need to be
applied in?

Best Reagrds,
Robert


On Sat, 16 Oct 1999, Robert wrote:

> Hmmmmm, those 2.2.11 raid patches did not work for me.  After applying and
> ignoring the 2 errors, I got this upon compiling:
> 
> gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.2.12/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -m486
> -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCPU=586   -DEXPORT_SYMTAB
> -c md.c
> md.c:96: `DEV_MD_SPEED_LIMIT' undeclared here (not in a function)
> md.c:96: initializer element for `md_table[0].ctl_name' is not constant
> md.c:102: `DEV_MD' undeclared here (not in a function)
> md.c:102: initializer element for `md_dir_table[0].ctl_name' is not constant
> make[3]: *** [md.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.12/drivers/block'
> make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.12/drivers/block'
> make[1]: *** [_subdir_block] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.12/drivers'
> make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2                 
> 
> 
> This was a stock 2.2.12 kernal from the tar-ball, with only one other
> patch applied first: ide.2.2.12.19991014.patch
> After applying the IDE patch, the kernel did compile without error.  But
> after then applying the patch raid0145-19990824-2.2.11 the compile failed
> as shown above.  Anyone have any thoughts, suggestions, ideas ?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Robert
> 
> <going back to try applying in the opposite order to see what does>
> 
> 
> On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Marc Haber wrote:
> 
> > In ka.lists.linux.raid, you wrote:
> > >I run a 2.2.12 kernel. Is the 2.2.11 raid patch included in that or do I
> > >need to use the 2.2.11 patch on the 2.2.12 source tree? Or should I
> > >downgrade my kernel? Also, as to the question I previously posted, I am
> > >using the most current set of raid tools.
> > 
> > You can use the 2.2.11 patch on 2.2.12. However, the patch will
> > complain but the changes the patch wants to do are already there. You
> > can safely ignore these messages.
> > 
> > Greetings
> > Marc
> > 
> > -- 
> > -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
> > Marc Haber          |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
> > Karlsruhe, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
> > Nordisch by Nature  | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
> > 
> 




Reply via email to