I said:
> At this point, the feature freeze for 2.3.x kicked in as well.
> Alan Cox suggested porting up to 2.3.x (there are some substantial
> differences), but that 2.4 (based on the existing 2.3 feature
> freeze) would still not include raid 0.90... that would have to
> wait for 2.5/2.6... at least that's what he said.
I was wrong. I wrote Alan Cox about it, he said:
> > would continue to work affect the 2.2.x outcome? I don't mean
> > to re-hash dead issues, but 2.6 seems a long way away for a
> > stable series with raid 0.90 in it.
>
> AFAIK Ingo is trying to get stuff done for 2.4
>
So that's as close as the end of the year to hear some people say it.
tom
