I understand what you're saying, and if that's the case, then fine, I will
switch to raid five, but there are about 100 other reports on this list of
"access beyond end of device" problems completely unrelated to well
anything. When I see this, it leads me to believe that the problem is
much deeper then a raid issue.
I will do what you suggest and report back to you. Thanks for your help.
-jeremy
> Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> > [discussions of OOPS with raid on raid deleted]
> >
> > I *really* need suggestions here. This is a system which is supposed to
> > go production on Monday and I'm not feeling too good about this.
>
> We discussed this last week, no? The bug has been reported and duplicated,
> ana appears to only happen when using raid layered on top of raid.
>
> While I appreciate your sense of urgency, I would suggest that (I would
> think obviously) that you aren't going to production on monday, not with
> this configuration. Last week I suggested using raid5 instead, which we
> know works well in production (especially since your 1/0 configuration does
> not offer anything more in terms or reliable redundancy). Have you tried
> that? I sincerely believe this will be at least your short term answer.
>
> As for getting the bug fixed, the number one way to make sure something gets
> fixed is do to it yourself. Barring that, you will probably have to settle
> for something that may not meet your deadlines. Certainly regularly
> reporting the bug (with more and more information) will help your case.
>
> You may wish to email Ingo Molnar, [EMAIL PROTECTED], who is the
> maintainer of the 0.90 raid code. Do realize, however, that he is very busy
> and he has many responsibilities in other sections of the code as well.
>
> tom
>
http://www.xxedgexx.com | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------
Y2K. We're all gonna die.
