On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 12:47:08PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote:
> > I'm a bit cautious here as I've had a bad experience when experimenting
> > with disk changing and ended up with a corrupted array.
Is it just me, or should the RAID superblock include information to make disk
ordering unimportant?
BTW: worst case (Assuming RAID 4/5), you can fail one partition, move it to
the new controller/new name, then add it back. repeat as necessary.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I don't know if it's what you want, but it's what you get. :-)
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
