Hi Bill, Thursday, March 30, 2000, 4:36:52 PM, you wrote: > I've been thinking about this for a different project, how bad would > it be to setup RAID 5 to allow for 2 (or more) failures in an array? > Or is this handled under a different class of RAID (ignoring things > like RAID 5 over mirrored disks and such). Raid 6 is exactly what you are looking for. Raid 5 with double parity info. You lose 2 disks of N. http://www.raid5.com/raid6.html Or you may just take Raid 7 http://www.raid5.com/raid7.html ... Sounds great. :-) Sven
- resizing raid arrays Theo Van Dinter
- Raid5 with two failed disks? Tmm
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Martin Bene
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Bill Carlson
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Theo Van Dinter
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Bill Carlson
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks... Theo Van Dinter
- Re: Raid5 with two failed d... Bill Carlson
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Marc Haber
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Sven Kirmess
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Tmm
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Marc Haber
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Jakob �stergaard
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks? Marc Haber
- Re: Raid5 with two failed disks... Jakob �stergaard
- Re: Raid5 with two failed d... Marc Haber
- Re: Raid5 with two failed d... Jakob �stergaard
- RE: Raid5 with two failed d... Rainer Mager
- RE: Raid5 with two failed d... Michael Robinton
- RE: Raid5 with two failed d... Rainer Mager
