Holger Kiehl wrote: > In my opinion Linux SW Raid is very stable. However, SW raid > stresses SCSI to its limit and any tiny error in the hardware As does HW Raid. No matter how you saturate your SCSI bus, its saturated. > will show up very quickly. Also, not all drivers handle > the situation when a disk dies, they hang up the bus. As far > as I know the NCR/Symbios- and AIC7xxx-driver will not > hang up the bus. ECC-Ram is also a must. I wouldn't say that ECC-RAM is a must for RAID systems - if you need it, you need it. -- Edward Schernau, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Architect http://www.schernau.com RC5-64#: 243249 e-gold acct #:131897
- stability of software RAID under Linux Darren Evans
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Jakob �stergaard
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Brian Kress
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Holger Kiehl
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Edward Schernau
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Holger Kiehl
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Thomas Waldmann
- Re: stability of software RAID under Linux Eric Ladner
- raid5 disk failure Mustafa Bodur
- Re: raid5 disk failure Piete Brooks
- Re: raid5 disk failure Jakob �stergaard
- Re: raid5 disk failure James Manning
- RE: stability of software RAID under Linux Shaw, Marco
