On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:

> Sounds reasonable.  But how do we prevent future confusion?  We should
> carefully define these terms in an obvious place, please.

Ok.

> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm_types.h 2011-08-10 14:08:42.000000000 
> > -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm_types.h      2011-08-10 14:09:02.000000000 
> > -0500
> > @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
> >     unsigned long hiwater_rss;      /* High-watermark of RSS usage */
> >     unsigned long hiwater_vm;       /* High-water virtual memory usage */
> >
> > -   unsigned long total_vm, locked_vm, shared_vm, exec_vm;
> > +   unsigned long total_vm, locked_vm, pinned_vm, shared_vm, exec_vm;
> >     unsigned long stack_vm, reserved_vm, def_flags, nr_ptes;
> >     unsigned long start_code, end_code, start_data, end_data;
> >     unsigned long start_brk, brk, start_stack;
>
> This is an obvious place.  Could I ask that you split all these up into
> one-definition-per-line and we can start in on properly documenting
> each field?

Will do that after the linuxcon.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to