Hi All, Will it be a good idea to have ha separate header for this feature. Lets not append to ib_verbs.h?
-Regards Devesh On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Parav Pandit <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Yishai Hadas > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10/15/2015 7:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote: >> >>> If there is stateless WQ being used by multiple QPs in multiplexed >> >> >> The WQ is not stateless and always has its own PD. >> >>> way, it should be able to multiplex between QP's of different PD as >>> well. >>> Otherwise for every PD being created, there will have be one WQ needed >>> to service all the QPs belonging to that PD. >> >> >> As mentioned, same WQ can serve multiple QPs, from PD point of view it >> behaves similarly to SRQ that may be associated with many QPs with different >> PDs. >> >> See IB SPEC, Release 1.3, o10-2.2.1: >> "SRQ may be associated with the same PD as used by one or more of its >> associated QPs or a different PD." >> >> As part of coming V1 will improve the commit message to better clarify the >> WQ's PD behavior, thanks. > > Ok. Got it. Thanks. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
