On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:00:22 +0200 Or Gerlitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Stephen, is the framework for linux-next merge tests OK with this tag? >> can you confirm that the-next bits of the rdma tree are covered fine? > linux-next fetches the "for-next" tag for that tree. Good! Doug, did you also manage to register this tag habit to the 0-day framework? we want all our subsystem patches to go through 0-day before they hit upstream, both rc fixes and next bits. Also, Doug, how do you suggest someone that wants to automatically track rc fixes branch? can you make another flying "for-rc" tag? Alaa, lets set our internal build system to follow on this tag too and let Doug know if we fail so he can coach us further. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
