On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Tom Talpey <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/23/2015 8:09 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >> >> >>> On Nov 23, 2015, at 7:39 PM, Tom Talpey <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 11/23/2015 5:20 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>>> >>>> Extra resources for handling backchannel requests have to be >>>> pre-allocated when a transport instance is created. Set a limit. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h | 5 +++++ >>>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 6 +++++- >>>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h >>>> b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h >>>> index f869807..478aa30 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h >>>> @@ -178,6 +178,11 @@ struct svcxprt_rdma { >>>> #define RPCRDMA_SQ_DEPTH_MULT 8 >>>> #define RPCRDMA_MAX_REQUESTS 32 >>>> #define RPCRDMA_MAX_REQ_SIZE 4096 >>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SUNRPC_BACKCHANNEL) >>> >>> >>> Why is this a config option? Why wouldn't you always want >>> this? It's needed for any post-1990 NFS dialect. >> >> >> I think some distros want to be able to compile out NFSv4.x >> on small systems, and take all the backchannel cruft with it. > > > So shouldn't it follow the NFSv4.x config options then?
It does. Why the question? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
