Hefty, Sean wrote: >> What would you suggest, given you did not like the ifndef __WIN__ in >> terms of readability? > > I was saying that it is slightly easier for me to read: > > #ifdef __WIN__ > // windows stuff > #else // <- not __WIN__ > // other stuff > #endif > > versus > > #ifndef __WIN_ > // other stuff > #else // <- not not __WIN__ > // windows stuff > #endif > > I don't have a problem with the use of __WIN__ or > > #ifndef __WIN__ > // other stuff > #endif
There is a fair amount of code hoisting to flip the ifndef __WIN__ --> ifdef __WIN__ for readability reasons. There are bigger fish to fry at this juncture. Perhaps into the future. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
