On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:08:33AM -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: > >Here is how I think this should all go. I can't steal some machines to > >test it right now (prolly can't till after SC|09), but David/Sean maybe > >you can have a look at it? > > I will try to test it some this week.
Thanks, probably won't work right away, but I feel it is closer.. Do you have any idea about the ARP things? Is whoever did this originally still around? > >AH, there is still another oopsie I just noticed, rdma_resolve_addr > >does not check that dst_addr and src_addr are the same AF > > I was actually considering making use of this to allow AF_INET or AF_INET6 to > communicate with AF_IB. There's not a protocol limitation to supporting this. Hum.. Not sure how that would work? src = AF_INET, dst = AF_IB? I guess I was hoping you'd be able to do the private data in userspace and avoid those kind of special cases.. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
