On 17:45 Fri 30 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On 09:13 Mon 10 Aug , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sm_mad_ctrl.c > >> b/opensm/opensm/osm_sm_mad_ctrl.c > >> index 791c848..f0bc407 100644 > >> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_sm_mad_ctrl.c > >> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_sm_mad_ctrl.c > >> @@ -723,7 +723,10 @@ static void sm_mad_ctrl_send_err_cb(IN void *context, > >> IN osm_madw_t * p_madw) > >> (p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_PORT_INFO || > >> p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_MCAST_FWD_TBL || > >> p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_SWITCH_INFO || > >> - p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_LIN_FWD_TBL)) { > >> + p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_LIN_FWD_TBL || > >> + p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_P_KEY_TABLE || > >> + p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_SLVL_TABLE || > >> + p_smp->attr_id == IB_MAD_ATTR_VL_ARBITRATION)) { > > > > Why this change? > > Why not ? Aren't these initialization failures ? Why should they be > excluded ? If I recall correctly, they were originally excluded due to > "newness" but that was years ago.
Ok, let's try this. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
