Line Holen wrote:
On 11/ 4/09 10:47 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
On 12:26 Tue 03 Nov , Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
Always do heavy sweep when there is only one node in the
fabric, and this node is a switch, and SM runs on top of it -
there may be a race when OSM starts running before the
external ports are ports are up, or if they went through
reset while SM was starting.
In this race switch brings up the ports and turns on the
PSC bit, but OSM might get PortInfo before SwitchInfo, and it
might see all ports as down, but PSC bit on. If that happens,
OSM turns off PSC bit, and it will never see external ports
again - it won't perform any heavy sweep, only light sweep
Could such race happen when there are more than one node in a fabric?
I think that my description of the race was misleading.
The race can happen on *any* fabric when SM runs on switch.
But when it does happen, SM thinks that the whole subnet
is just one switch - that's what it managed to discover.
I've actually seen it happening.
So the patch fixes this particular case.
So the next question that you would probably ask is can
this race happen on some *other* switch and not the one
SM is running on?
Well, I don't know. I have a hunch that it can't, but I
couldn't prove it to myself yet.
The race on the managed switch is a special case because
SM always sees port 0, and always gets responses to its
SMP queries. On any other switch, if the ports were reset,
SM won't get any response until the ports are up again.
Perhaps there might be a case where SM got some port as down,
and by the time SM got SwitchInfo with PSC bit the port
was already up, so SM won't start discovery beyond this
port. But this race would be fixed on the next heavy sweep,
when SM will discover this port that it missed the previous
time, whereas race on managed switch is fatal - SM won't
ever do any heavy sweep.
-- Yevgeny
At least for the 3.2 branch there is a general race regardless of
where the SM is running. I haven't checked the current master, but
I cannot recall seeing any patches related to this so I assume
the race is still there.
There is a window between SM discovering a switch and clearing PSC
for the same switch. The SM will not detect a state change on the
switch ports during this time.
If the port changes state during that period, the switch issues
new trap 128, which (I think) should cause SM to re-discover the
fabric once this discovery cycle is over. Is this correct?
Or perhaps the more serious problem happens when SM LID is not
configured yet on the switch, hence the trap is not going to the
right place?
I have a patch for the 3.2 branch that I can merge into master.
Sure, that would be nice :)
-- Yevgeny
Line
Sasha
Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <[email protected]>
---
opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
b/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
index 4303d6e..537c855 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_state_mgr.c
@@ -1062,13 +1062,18 @@ static void do_sweep(osm_sm_t * sm)
* Otherwise, this is probably our first discovery pass
* or we are connected in loopback. In both cases do a
* heavy sweep.
- * Note: If we are connected in loopback we want a heavy
- * sweep, since we will not be getting any traps if there is
- * a lost connection.
+ * Note the following:
+ * 1. If we are connected in loopback we want a heavy sweep,
since we
+ * will not be getting any traps if there is a lost connection.
+ * 2. If we are in DISCOVERING state - this means it is either in
+ * initializing or wake up from STANDBY - run the heavy sweep.
+ * 3. If there is only one node in the fabric, and this node is a
+ * switch, and OSM runs on top of it, there might be a race when
+ * OSM starts running before the external ports are up - run the
+ * heavy sweep.
*/
- /* if we are in DISCOVERING state - this means it is either in
- * initializing or wake up from STANDBY - run the heavy sweep */
if (cl_qmap_count(&sm->p_subn->sw_guid_tbl)
+ && cl_qmap_count(&sm->p_subn->node_guid_tbl) != 1
&& sm->p_subn->sm_state != IB_SMINFO_STATE_DISCOVERING
&& sm->p_subn->opt.force_heavy_sweep == FALSE
&& sm->p_subn->force_heavy_sweep == FALSE
--
1.5.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
