On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 16:52 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > I reviewed patches 1-6 & 8 and they all look fine, I will give the whole
> > series
> > a try later this week to further validate them
>
I tested ipv4 and ipv6 address resolution using ucmatose. All my tests
ran fine. I tested with patches 1 through 9 on ofed
1.5(OFED-1.5-20091118-0600) on 2.6.30. Ucmatose was taken from Sean's
librdmacm git (required for ipv6 support). Here are the tests I ran:
ucmatose
[-s server_address]
[-b bind_address]
ipv4 - Local address
----------------------
ucmatose -s 127.0.0.1
ucmatose -s 192.168.0.199
ucmatose -b 192.168.0.199 -s 192.168.0.199
ipv4 - Remote address
----------------------
ucmatose -s 192.168.0.198
ucmatose -b 192.168.0.199 -s 192.168.0.198
ipv6 - Local addresses
-----------------------
ucmatose -s fe80::202:c903:1:28ed%ib0
ucmatose -s 2001:db8:1234::1
ucmatose -b fe80::202:c903:1:28ed%ib0 -s fe80::202:c903:1:28ed%ib0
ucmatose -b 2001:db8:1234::1 -s 2001:db8:1234::1
ucmatose -b 2001:db8:1234::1 -s fe80::202:c903:1:28ed%ib0
ucmatose -b fe80::202:c903:1:28ee%ib1 -s 2001:db8:1234::1
ucmatose -b 2001:db8:1234::10 -s 2001:db8:1234::1
ipv6 - Remote addresses
------------------------
ucmatose -s 2001:db8:1234::2
ucmatose -b 2001:db8:1234::1 -s 2001:db8:1234::2
ucmatose -b fe80::202:c903:1:28ed%ib0 -s 2001:db8:1234::2
ucmatose -b fe80::202:c903:1:28ee%ib1 -s 2001:db8:1234::2
ucmatose -s fe80::202:c903:1:1925%ib0
ucmatose -b 2001:db8:1234::1 -s fe80::202:c903:1:1925%ib0
ucmatose -b fe80::202:c903:1:28ed%ib0 -s fe80::202:c903:1:1925%ib0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
