On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Céline Bourde <[email protected]> wrote: > My /var/log/opensm.log output: > > Nov 20 14:33:58 824870 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_init: 1000 pending > umads specified > Nov 20 14:33:58 825157 [9C8566F0] 0x80 -> Entering DISCOVERING state > Using default GUID 0x2c9000100d00056d > Loading Cached Option:qos_max_vls = 8 > Loading Cached Option:qos_high_limit = 1 > Loading Cached Option:qos_vlarb_high = 0:1,1:0,2:0,3:0,4:0 > Loading Cached Option:qos_vlarb_low = 0:1,1:2,2:4,3:8,4:0,5:32 > Loading Cached Option:qos_sl2vl = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 > Entering MASTER state > > Nov 20 14:33:58 840416 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port > 0x2c9000100d00056d > Nov 20 14:33:58 877496 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port > 0x2c9000100d00056d > Nov 20 14:33:58 877646 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port > 0x2c9000100d00056d > Nov 20 14:33:58 877794 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_opensm_bind: Setting IS_SM on > port 0x2c9000100d00056d > Nov 20 14:33:58 952249 [98C4F910] 0x80 -> Entering MASTER state > Nov 20 14:33:58 952467 [98C4F910] 0x02 -> osm_qos_parse_policy_file: Loading > QoS policy file (/etc/opensm/qos-policy.conf) > Nov 20 14:33:59 047411 [9824E910] 0x01 -> sm_mad_ctrl_rcv_callback: ERR > 3111: Error status = 0x1C > Nov 20 14:33:59 047894 [9824E910] 0x01 -> SMP dump: > base_ver................0x1 > mgmt_class..............0x81 > class_ver...............0x1 > method..................0x81 (SubnGetResp) > D bit...................0x1 > status..................0x1C > hop_ptr.................0x0 > hop_count...............0x2 > trans_id................0x18ef > attr_id.................0x17 > (SLtoVLMappingTable) > resv....................0x0 > attr_mod................0x0 > m_key...................0x0000000000000000 > dr_slid.................65535 > dr_dlid.................65535 > > Initial path: 0,1,31 > Return path: 0,22,1 > Reserved: [0][0][0][0][0][0][0] > > 01 23 45 67 01 23 45 6F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 00 > > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 00 > > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 00 > > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 00
What node (NodeInfo) is at direct route 0,1,31 relative to the SM node ? Is it just this AM failing for the SLtoVLMapping attribute or others too ? -- Hal > > Céline Bourde a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to configure qos-policy.donc file for service-id use. >> I've tried basic RDMA_PS_TCP service-id level with service id 0x0106 >> >> []# cat /etc/opensm/qos-policy.conf >> qos-levels >> qos-level >> name: DEFAULT >> sl: 0 >> end-qos-level >> qos-level >> name: TCP >> sl: 4 >> end-qos-level >> qos-level >> name: MPI >> sl: 5 >> end-qos-level >> end-qos-levels >> >> qos-ulps >> default : 0 # default SL >> any, service-id 0x0000000001060000- 0x000000000106FFFF : 4 >> end-qos-ulps >> >> I add this rule in my configuration and check by mapping >> sl 4 on a vl with a weight of 0 >> >> # QoS default options >> qos_max_vls 8 >> qos_high_limit 1 >> qos_vlarb_high 0:1,1:0,2:0,3:0,4:0 >> qos_vlarb_low 0:1,1:2,2:4,3:8,4:0,5:32 >> qos_sl2vl 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 >> >> I've launched qperf on the server side >> and listen on client: >> >> j=100; for i in $(seq 0 $j) ; do /usr/bin/qperf -ri mlx4_0:1 -li mlx4_0:1 >> 10.12.1.4 -sl 4 -lp 20004 rc_bw; done; >> rc_bw: >> bw = 0 bytes/sec >> rc_bw: >> bw = 0 bytes/sec >> >> j=100; for i in $(seq 0 $j) ; do /usr/bin/qperf -ri mlx4_0:1 -li mlx4_0:1 >> 10.12.1.4 -sl 5 -lp 20005 rc_bw; done; >> rc_bw: >> bw = 3.37 GB/sec >> rc_bw: >> bw = 3.37 GB/sec >> >> Qperf gives me results I expected due to qos-level configuration part, but >> no >> expected results using qperf tcp_bw, bandwith is not >> filtered/blocked by sl weight. >> >> # j=100; for i in $(seq 0 $j) ; do /usr/bin/qperf 10.12.1.4 tcp_bw; done; >> tcp_bw: >> bw = 923 MB/sec >> tcp_bw: >> bw = 935 MB/sec >> >> j=100; for i in $(seq 0 $j) ; do /usr/bin/qperf -ri mlx4_0:1 -li mlx4_0:1 >> 10.12.1.4 -sl 5 -lp 20005 rc_bw; done; >> rc_bw: >> bw = 2.23 GB/sec >> rc_bw: >> bw = 2.24 GB/sec >> rc_bw: >> bw = 2.21 GB/sec >> >> Could you help me to understanding service-id mechanism or give me a >> relevant >> test to test TCP service id level ? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Céline Bourde. >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in >> the body of a message to [email protected] >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to [email protected] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
