Hi Paul, you are not missing anything - lookback communication will work in RDMAoE just as in IB. --Liran
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Grun [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 10:55 AM To: 'Or Gerlitz'; Liran Liss Cc: 'Sean Hefty'; 'Jason Gunthorpe'; 'Eli Cohen'; 'Jeff Squyres'; [email protected] Subject: RE: RDMAoE verbs questions Why do you say that Or? I'm a hardware guy so can't comment on what the s/w supports/prevents, but I can see no reason why loopback wouldn't be supported. In fact, if I were guessing, I would guess that the spec currently under development would support loopback.tt What am I missing? -Paul -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Or Gerlitz Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 12:09 AM To: Liran Liss Cc: Sean Hefty; Jason Gunthorpe; Eli Cohen; Jeff Squyres; [email protected] Subject: Re: RDMAoE verbs questions Liran Liss wrote: > from an rdmacm app's point of view - there is no visible difference between IB and RDMAoE ports: both support the complete set of Verbs, just as any IB transport provider > wrong, local (loopback) communication aren't supported with RDMAoE. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
