On 09:02 Mon 21 Dec , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > I wouldn't call it so, it is rather "parallel" than "first" depth or > > breath - discovery continues at first responding node doesn't matter how > > was it queried in depth or in breath. > > Does anything limit the amount of parallelism ?
Nothing in this version. > > I think so. The difference is that OpenSM has a limit of outstanding > > MADs on the wire and subnet_discover doesn't (and there could be a lot > > of MADs). > > Isn't that dangerous in a real subnet ? This is test tool, so I don't think that it is "dangerous". And of course this can lead to an issues with test results. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
