On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 15:22 Mon 25 Jan     , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>>
>> when using optimized programming and it's supported by the switch
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> Add in update of vlarb tables for port 0 when optimized but no SL to VL
>> tables needed to be configured on that port
>>
>> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
>> index f814ea8..218e128 100644
>> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
>> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_qos.c
>> @@ -243,13 +243,15 @@ static int qos_extports_setup(osm_sm_t * sm, 
>> osm_node_t *node,
>>  }
>>
>>  static int qos_endport_setup(osm_sm_t * sm, osm_physp_t * p,
>> -                          const struct qos_config *qcfg)
>> +                          const struct qos_config *qcfg, int vlarb_only)
>>  {
>>       unsigned force_update = p->need_update || sm->p_subn->need_update;
>>
>>       p->vl_high_limit = qcfg->vl_high_limit;
>>       if (vlarb_update(sm, p, 0, force_update, qcfg))
>>               return -1;
>> +     if (vlarb_only)
>> +             return 0;
>>
>>       if (!(p->port_info.capability_mask & IB_PORT_CAP_HAS_SL_MAP))
>>               return 0;
>> @@ -269,6 +271,7 @@ int osm_qos_setup(osm_opensm_t * p_osm)
>>       osm_port_t *p_port;
>>       osm_node_t *p_node;
>>       int ret = 0;
>> +     int vlarb_only;
>>
>>       if (!p_osm->subn.opt.qos)
>>               return 0;
>> @@ -292,6 +295,7 @@ int osm_qos_setup(osm_opensm_t * p_osm)
>>       p_tbl = &p_osm->subn.port_guid_tbl;
>>       p_next = cl_qmap_head(p_tbl);
>>       while (p_next != cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) {
>> +             vlarb_only = 0;
>>               p_port = (osm_port_t *) p_next;
>>               p_next = cl_qmap_next(p_next);
>>
>> @@ -305,13 +309,20 @@ int osm_qos_setup(osm_opensm_t * p_osm)
>>                           (&p_node->sw->switch_info))
>>                               continue;
>>
>> +                     if 
>> (ib_switch_info_get_opt_sl2vlmapping(&p_node->sw->switch_info) &&
>> +                         p_osm->sm.p_subn->opt.use_optimized_slvl &&
>> +                         !memcmp(&swe_config.sl2vl, &sw0_config.sl2vl,
>> +                                 sizeof(swe_config.sl2vl)))
>> +                             vlarb_only = 1;
>> +
>
> qos_extports_setup() is running port setup loop (for both VLArb *and*
> SL2VL) as:
>
>        for (i = 1; i < num_ports; i++) {
>                ...
>        }
>
> , starting from port '1'.
>
> So you case will just effectively skip any SL2VL setup for port 0
> (it was commented for V1 too).

This is intended. It's not needed since it's only doing this in the
wildcarded case and the wildcarding includes port 0.

-- Hal

>
> Sasha
>
>>                       cfg = &sw0_config;
>>               } else if (osm_node_get_type(p_node) == IB_NODE_TYPE_ROUTER)
>>                       cfg = &rtr_config;
>>               else
>>                       cfg = &ca_config;
>>
>> -             if (qos_endport_setup(&p_osm->sm, p_port->p_physp, cfg))
>> +             if (qos_endport_setup(&p_osm->sm, p_port->p_physp, cfg,
>> +                                   vlarb_only))
>>                       ret = -1;
>>       }
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to