On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <[email protected]> wrote:
[ ... ]
SRP initiator seems to be not too well optimized for the best performance. ISER
initiator is noticeably better in this area.
(replying to an e-mail of one month ago)
I'm not sure the above statement makes sense. Below you can find the
performance results for 512-byte reads with a varying number of
threads and a NULLIO target. With a sufficiently high number of
threads this test saturated the two CPU cores of the initiator system
but not the CPU core of the target system. So one can conclude from
the numbers below that for the initiator and target software
combinations used for this test that although the difference is small,
the latency for the SRP traffic is slightly lower than that of the
iSER traffic and also that the CPU usage of the SRP traffic is
slightly lower than that of the iSER traffic. These numbers are quite
impressive since one can conclude from the numbers below that for both
protocols one I/O operation is completed by the initiator system in
about 17 microseconds or 44000 clock cycles.
iSER:
1 read : io=128MB, bw=13,755KB/s, iops=27,510, runt= 9529msec
2 read : io=256MB, bw=26,118KB/s, iops=52,235, runt= 10037msec
4 read : io=512MB, bw=48,985KB/s, iops=97,970, runt= 10703msec
8 read : io=1,024MB, bw=57,519KB/s, iops=115K, runt= 18230msec
16 read : io=2,048MB, bw=57,880KB/s, iops=116K, runt= 36233msec
32 read : io=4,096MB, bw=57,990KB/s, iops=116K, runt= 72328msec
64 read : io=8,192MB, bw=58,066KB/s, iops=116K, runt=144468msec
CPU load for 64 threads (according to vmstat 2): 20% us + 80% sy on
the initiator and 40% us + 20% sy + 40% id on the target.
SRP:
1 read : io=128MB, bw=14,211KB/s, iops=28,422, runt= 9223msec
2 read : io=256MB, bw=26,275KB/s, iops=52,549, runt= 9977msec
4 read : io=512MB, bw=49,257KB/s, iops=98,513, runt= 10644msec
8 read : io=1,024MB, bw=60,322KB/s, iops=121K, runt= 17383msec
16 read : io=2,048MB, bw=61,272KB/s, iops=123K, runt= 34227msec
32 read : io=4,096MB, bw=61,176KB/s, iops=122K, runt= 68561msec
64 read : io=8,192MB, bw=60,963KB/s, iops=122K, runt=137602msec
CPU load for 64 threads (according to vmstat 2): 20% us + 80% sy on
the initiator and 0% us + 50% sy + 50% id on the target.
Setup details:
* The above output was generated with the following command:
for i in 1 2 4 8 16 32 64; do printf "%2d " $i; io-load 512 $i
${initiator_device} | grep runt; done
* The io-load script is as follows:
#!/bin/sh
blocksize="${1:-512}"
threads="${2:-1}"
dev="${3:-sdj}"
fio --bs="${blocksize}" --buffered=0 --size=128M --ioengine=sg
--rw=read --invalidate=1 --end_fsync=1 --thread --numjobs="${threads}"
--loops=1 --group_reporting --name=nullio --filename=/dev/${dev}
* SRP target software: SCST r1522 compiled in release mode.
* iSER target software: tgt 1.0.2.
* InfiniBand hardware: QDR PCIe 2.0 HCA's.
* Initiator system:
2.6.33-rc7 kernel (for-next branch of Rolands InfiniBand repository
without the recently posted iSER and SRP performance improvement
patches).
SRP initiator was loaded with parameter srp_sg_tablesize=128
Frequency scaling was disabled.
Runlevel: 3.
CPU: E6750 @ 2.66GHz.
* Target system:
2.6.30.7 kernel + SCST patches.
Frequency scaling was disabled.
Runlevel: 3.
CPU: E8400 @ 3.00GHz booted with maxcpus=1.
