On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17:38 Mon 01 Mar , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote: >> We can add the trap generation to this patch. >> what do you think? > > I think that if you need this feature than it should be implemented > correctly (without assumptions that use can provide a "proper" files), > this should include some sort of connected client handling (in case if > its port disappear it could be disconnected for example).
We can verify local port is still available. > > For me it would seem more like topology "merge" rather then "reload" > feature. So if we call this option "merge" with local port validation this will be acceptable? Eli > > Sasha > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
