On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:46:06AM -0700, Sean Hefty wrote:
> >> } else if ((addr->sa_family == AF_INET6)) {
> >> ipv6_ib_mc_map(&sin6->sin6_addr, dev_addr->broadcast, mc_map);
> >> - if (id_priv->id.ps == RDMA_PS_UDP)
> >> + if (id_priv->id.ps == RDMA_PS_UDP || id_priv->id.ps ==
> RDMA_PS_IB)
> >> mc_map[7] = 0x01; /* Use RDMA CM signature */
> >> *mgid = *(union ib_gid *) (mc_map + 4);
> >
> >What does the combination of AF_INET/INET6 and RDMA_PS_IB mean?
>
> This indicates that the rdma_cm_id is bound to AF_IB/RDMA_PS_IB, but that the
> multicast join address was provided using AF_INET6. The 'else' code that
> follows the above code:
Humm, interesting.. So you propose to accept addresses for families
other than the one used to create the cm_id?
Just from a simplicity of the future perspective I'd say not to bother
...
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
