On 13:46 Tue 13 Apr , Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
>
> > +static int recv_port_info(smp_engine_t *engine, ibnd_smp_t * smp,
> > + uint8_t *mad, void *cb_data)
> > +{
> > + ibnd_fabric_t *fabric = ((ibnd_scan_t *)engine->user_data)->fabric;
> > + ibnd_node_t *node = (ibnd_node_t *)cb_data;
> > + ibnd_port_t *port;
> > + uint8_t *port_info = mad + IB_SMP_DATA_OFFS;
> > + uint8_t port_num, local_port;
> > +
> > + port_num = mad_get_field(mad, 0, IB_MAD_ATTRMOD_F);
> > + local_port = mad_get_field(port_info, 0, IB_PORT_LOCAL_PORT_F);
> > +
> > + /* this may have been created before */
> > + port = node->ports[port_num];
> > + if (!port) {
> > + port = node->ports[port_num] = calloc(1, sizeof(*port));
> > + if (!port) {
> > + IBND_ERROR("Failed to allocate port\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + memcpy(port->info, port_info, sizeof(port->info));
> > + port->node = node;
> > + port->portnum = port_num;
> > + port->ext_portnum = 0;
> > + port->base_lid = (uint16_t) mad_get_field(port->info, 0, IB_PORT_LID_F);
> > + port->lmc = (uint8_t) mad_get_field(port->info, 0, IB_PORT_LMC_F);
> > +
> > + if (port_num == 0) {
> > + node->smalid = port->base_lid;
> > + node->smalmc = port->lmc;
> > + } else if (node->type == IB_NODE_SWITCH) {
> > + port->base_lid = node->smalid;
> > + port->lmc = node->smalmc;
> > + }
> > +
> > + add_to_portguid_hash(port, fabric->portstbl);
> > +
> > + debug_port(&smp->path, port);
> >
> > - mad_dump_node_type(type, 64, &node->type, sizeof(int));
> > - printf("%s -> %s %s {%016" PRIx64 "} portnum %d base lid %d-%d\"%s\"\n",
> > - portid2str(path), prompt, type, node->guid,
> > - node->type == IB_NODE_SWITCH ? 0 : port->portnum,
> > - port->base_lid,
> > - port->base_lid + (1 << port->lmc) - 1, node->nodedesc);
> > + if (port_num &&
> > + (mad_get_field(port->info, 0, IB_PORT_PHYS_STATE_F)
> > + == IB_PORT_PHYS_STATE_LINKUP)
> > + &&
> > + (node->type == IB_NODE_SWITCH || node == fabric->from_node)) {
>
> What will happen when ibnetdiscover runs from host connected by two
> ports to different subnets? Wouldn't it run over both fabrics (following
> PortInfo querying loop in recv_node_info() below)?
I tested with two connected ports. This doesn't work - it tries to cross
another fabric from another port of local node, but failed to send (CA
doesn't route MADs). So this case should be fixed as:
if (port_num && port_state == IB_PORT_PHYS_STATE_LINKUP &&
((node->type == IB_NODE_SWITCH && port_num != local_port) ||
(node == fabric->from_node && port_num == local_port)))
Sasha
>
> > +
> > + ib_portid_t path = smp->path;
> > + if (extend_dpath(engine, &path, port_num) != -1)
> > + query_node_info(engine, &path, node);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
