David Miller wrote:
From: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:54:22 +0900

Cong Wang wrote:
Sean Hefty wrote:
I like this version, thanks!  I'm not sure which tree to merge it through.
Are you needing this for 2.6.34, or is 2.6.35 okay?

As soon as possible, so 2.6.34. :)

Cong, merge window for 2.6.34 was already closed.
You need to make your patchset towards 2.6.35 (using net-next-2.6 tree)
rather than 2.6.34 (using linux-2.6 tree). Therefore, this patch being
queued for 2.6.35 (through net-next-2.6 tree) should be okay for you.

I don't take RDMA patches into net-next-2.6, the less I touch this
stack avoiding stuff the better and Roland has been taking this stuff
into his own tree for some time now.

I left for a few days.

Ok, so I will wait for this to be merged.

Thanks, David and Tetsuo!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to