> +#define IB_PATH_RECORD_REVERSIBLE 0x80
 > +
 > +struct ib_path_record

Can we use IBV_ / ibv_ prefixes here to match the rest of libibverbs?
Also having struct ibv_sa_path_rec and struct ibv_path_record is sort of
unfortunate.  Not sure if I can think of a better name here though --
ibv_raw_path_record?  ibv_packed_path_record?  Oh well...
-- 
Roland Dreier <[email protected]> || For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to